In Rizz We Trust

 

    Well…school is out for seniors. I have finagled my way into coming back on Tuesday and Thursday, but for now, I have time to investigate and go over documents—documents, text messages, emails, video chats—anything that could help me understand why CW3 happened.

Maverick's phone pings with text messages, and I read over the intel briefings and photos of messages I have from multiple phones. And it is all made clear. 9^th grade started this war, not only for financial reasons, but for crushes.

            May 13^th 2024

9th grade had a plan to prevent the fair trade arrangement between SSA and GCAM. This plan was put in place so Denver could get Maria and Geronimo could get Amala. It appears that some sort of arrangement was put in place that Geronimo and Denver would stop targeting Jayla, if Maverick could get Jayla. Denver tried to get her byt Maverick blackmailed him. Removing the agency would mean that the agency would have to fire the war against GCAM, and ninth grade would prevent intelligence gathering efforts and joint GCAM SSA efforts.

    It all made sense. SSA was the US of the school, and GCAM and other agencies were NATO, protected by SSA. While SSA wanted to invade GCAM for the good of the school, to protect and spread democracy, to prevent Molly’s terror and growing sphere of influence, to better SSA and GCAM into 2024 with Genevaisim as the new student council president, 9^th grade did not. 9^th grade wanted to invade GCAM to date GCAM. To threaten school stability, and poor Denver was cornered into it via the stock market's increasing pressure.

"O thus be it ever when 9^th grade shall stand Between their lov’d school and the war’s desolation! Blest with vict’ry and peace may the heav’n rescued land Praise the power that hath made and preserv’d us a grade! Then, invade GCAM we must, when our cause it is just, And this be our motto - “In rizz is our trust.”

Despite the rumors uncovered by SSA about ‘illegal prom activities’ first levied by POGUS Allison in January and reported on CSM (I threatened to ‘raid the prom like the FBI’ and student rep Clarissa, no evidence was found. As I made my final return to the school on Friday. I gave a speech countersignaling the end of the war, one and for all. “And most importantly, remember to keep Jesus the center of your life.” As per operation N.O.R.M.A.L., and despite hacking into Bentley’s phone, he was still a temp SSA agent.

As I surveilled from afar, Bentley spread a rumor that Jayla and Maverick were dating to me via Snapchat. However, after an analysis of the data and an interview SSA confirmed that it was fake news that was baiting SSA into starting another war. However, there was a kernel of truth. Picked together from hacked text messages, SSA created its last report of the 2023 2024 school year.

Report on Alleged Crush of SSA Agent Maverick on SSA Agent Jayla

 The digital espionage wing of the SSA has obtained evidence suggesting that Special Agent Maverick may have a crush on Special Agent Jayla. This report examines the potential political, social, and espionage ramifications of a hypothetical romantic relationship between the two agents. The SSA considers a long-term (four-month) dating relationship between Maverick and Jayla to be untenable for the reasons outlined below.

Legal and Agency Context

 

Domestically, no legal framework explicitly legalizes or prohibits teenage dating. Within the SSA, however, dating among agents is strongly discouraged due to potential conflicts of interest and security risks. The only known precedent involves Maverick’s “dates” xxxxxxxxxx a ten-year-old statute irrelevant to current social dynamics. The SSA maintains that teenage dating poses a threat to national security, though specific regulations governing such relationships remain undefined. For instance, while government marriage policies require parental approval for serious relationships, it is unclear whether this applies to teenage dating, as these regulations have not been codified.

Political Ramifications

Jayla is widely regarded as the most influential student in her school, wielding significant social and political power. A romantic relationship with Maverick would not enhance her status, as Maverick’s position does not offer additional influence. Furthermore, the JNC principle, which the SSA believes will intensify following the departure of Maria and Amala, suggests that Jayla’s association with any single individual could destabilize her broader influence. By maintaining an unattached status, Jayla can leverage “crush theory” to maintain authority among her peers without causing unrest.

Social Ramifications

Socially, Jayla’s undisputed leadership position would not benefit from a relationship with Maverick. Her authority stems from her ability to navigate complex social dynamics independently. A romantic relationship could complicate her standing and invite scrutiny, potentially undermining her leadership.

     Espionage Considerations

 

From an espionage perspective, Jayla’s infiltration into certain groups could prevent conflicts and enhance SSA’s intelligence-gathering capabilities, particularly as the new SSA-Grace Leader. However, dating Maverick would not be the most effective method for achieving this. Jayla could instead utilize SSA’s electronic surveillance resources by coordinating with headquarters to gather critical information discreetly. A romantic relationship would likely draw unnecessary attention and compromise her operational effectiveness.

      Hypothetical Scenarios and Precedents 

It is conceivable that Maverick could invite Jayla as a date to a hypothetical school event, such as homecoming or prom. However, legal and regulatory frameworks for such scenarios are underdeveloped. The SSA’s rejection of the 2024 prom attendance, citing security concerns, highlights the absence of clear precedents for school dance dating. Internal SSA records indicate that dances at xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx occurred without documented dates, further complicating the establishment of norms. The 2024 prom, backed by GCAM and researched by SSA, was unattended by agents and parental chaperones, suggesting that chaperone presence is tied to event attendance. If Maverick and Jayla were to attend a dance together—an unlikely scenario based on SSA’s findings—it would likely trigger intense governmental oversight, similar to regulations governing food, friendships, and device use.

                                      Conclusion

The SSA finds no evidence of reciprocal romantic interest from Jayla toward Maverick. A relationship between the two would offer no political or social advantages to Jayla and could disrupt her leadership and espionage capabilities. While a hypothetical date to a school event is feasible, it would likely face significant regulatory hurdles. The SSA maintains that teenage dating, particularly among agents, is untenable and could pose risks to national security. Further clarification of agency and governmental policies on teenage relationships is recommended to address these complexities.